I.The Peer-review Panel:

1. The Peer-review Panel is charged with the conception, the evaluation and the journal publication.
2. It has the authority of the final decision to accept an article or not.
3. The Peer-review Panel evaluations are based solely on academic criteria, regardless of gender, nationality, religion or any other criterion of discrimination
4. It ensures the anonymity of the evaluators.
5. It also ensures the prevention of any conflict of interest. 
6. It creates a blacklist of authors plagiarising materials, falsifying information and any other form of academic ethics violation.

II.The Issue Coordinator:

1. The coordinator of an issue should present an argumentation to the Peer-review Panel for study and validation.
2. After the argument validation and the call for papers, the coordinator ensures the follow-up of evaluations in a close collaboration with the journal secretariat.
3. The Coordinator ensures the anonymity of the evaluations. S/he also treats issues of plagiarism, falsification, conflicts of interest, discrimination and any other issues relevant to the ethical register.
4. In agreement with the peer-review panel, the coordinator proposes the issue title, the articles layout and the content of the journal sections.
5. The Peer-review Panel suspends the collaboration with the Coordinator in case of non-compliance with her/his commitments. The number will be assigned to another coordinator.

III. The Evaluator:

1. S/he should evaluate the article objectively according to the content of the contract s/he signed with the journal.
2. S/he ensures the confidentiality of the documents entrusted to her/him. S/he also treats issues of plagiarism, falsification, conflicts of interest, discrimination and any other issues relevant to the ethical register.
3. The Peer-review Panel suspends the collaboration with any evaluator who does not comply with her/his commitments. The article will be entrusted to another evaluator.